Gen Z to AI Agents: You Handle the Toilet Paper, We'll Handle the Vibes
1 in 5 Gen Z are ready to never think about everyday household items again and that's just the beginning of the great cognitive handoff
My twenty-something co-worker has four tabs open, comparing creatine gummy bioavailability rates while simultaneously bookmarking her fifteenth potential brunch spot. “Ugh, I wish the right health stuff was just optimized into my life,” she groans, before immediately lighting up: “Then I could focus on the research I actually care about, like finding the perfect bottomless mimosa spot.” Bottoms up.
While AI Agents seem like distant future tech, our latest Harris Poll research reveals Gen Z is ready to start experimenting now. 24% would let AI file their taxes (vs. 16% of all adults), 21% would outsource household shopping (vs. 11%), 19% would delegate beauty and skincare decisions (vs. 10%).
And 63% believe “the future belongs to people who can direct AI, not compete with it.”
They’re not afraid of automation—they’re desperate for liberation from decision fatigue.
But here’s what everyone misses: This isn’t JUST about technology adoption. It’s about Gen Z trying to claw back time for what our research keeps revealing they desperately want: real human connection, serendipitous encounters, the analog experiences they romanticize from the ‘90s they never fully experienced.
Product Choice Fatigue Is Real
When it comes to product choices, Gen Z is fatigued. Every purchase requires:
Determining which reviews are real vs. bot-generated (increasingly a challenge)
Researching the entire supply chain for ethical concerns
Comparing endless options with marginal differences
Is it any wonder that 21% would happily let an AI agent handle buying toilet paper? They’re not lazy, they’re drowning in decisions that feel simultaneously crucial and meaningless.
This moment crystallized something I’ve been tracking since my AdWeek panel with Rokt’s Chief AI Officer, Claire Southey. She painted a vivid picture:
“You’re dealing with a purchaser reading 200,000 reviews about the box of tissues you produce, reading your company’s ethical standards, thinking about your returns practices before making a decision on a $2 purchase.”
For Gen Z, that level of automated diligence sounds like relief, not dystopia.
We’re All at the Starting Line
Claire emphasized during our panel that we’re just at the beginning phase of agents: “The standards for agents to interact with each other have only been developed in the last three months. The interconnecting technology that builds the foundation is relatively new today.”
Translation: Nobody’s behind because the race hasn’t started. But the behavioral readiness? The signals are showing.
The Three Ingredients for Trust
When I asked Claire what it takes for AI agents to actually work, she was refreshingly pragmatic: “We need electricity, we need infrastructure, and we need data.” But then she revealed something crucial about consumer psychology.
“There are three things consumers care about when someone’s using their information to make purchasing decisions on their behalf,” she explained. “Transparency—they know how their data is being used. Fair value exchange—they’re getting reciprocal value for what they give. And control—they can delete and exit anytime they want.”
This maps perfectly to who’s already comfortable with delegation:
41 million Americans already use Subscribe & Save (control: cancel anytime)
141 million Americans already buy groceries online (transparency: see exactly what you’re getting)
60-65 million already file taxes self-prepared digitally (value exchange: accuracy for convenience)
The Shopping Evolution Divide
When I asked about adoption timelines, Claire distinguished between product types: “Low consideration purchases—buying household items—I expect to see agentic e-commerce take those over very quickly. But high consideration purchases where you get dopamine from crafting the experience, like planning a holiday? Those will take much longer.”
She compared it to previous tech adoption: “It took years for consumers to build trust with web purchasing, then mobile. I expect the same with agentic e-commerce.”
But here’s the accelerant: attention scarcity. “Most humans are making a trade-off between the amount of attention that they have available to commit to the shopping themselves and how important it is for them to make decisions themselves versus not.” Gen Z has already made their choice—they want their attention back.
Low Consideration’s Extinction Event
Claire’s insights were sobering for brands selling everyday products.
“You don’t get feedback anymore. You’re abstracted away from the purchasing decision. Those brands will be forced to be more consumer-focused, but will have even less feedback about consumer intent than they’ve ever had before.”
When I pressed about whether low-consideration brands might innovate more to stand out, she was skeptical: “Brand power won’t matter as much. The levels of evaluation from an agent processing thousands of brands instantaneously won’t be influenced by brand power, but very much about your product.”
Imagine being Kleenex and discovering that no human will ever consciously choose you again. Your new customer is an algorithm that makes decisions in milliseconds based on complete information scanning—something no human could ever do but every agent will.
What This Means for Brands Right Now
Based on my conversation at AdWeek with Claire and our data:
Make Your Data Machine-Readable: Product information, ethics policies, return practices—everything needs to be clear and comprehensive for algorithms to parse. The tissue brand with the cleanest data wins.
The Trust Trinity Matters: Transparency, value exchange, and control. These three elements determine whether consumers will delegate decisions to AI. Miss one and you’re out.
Prepare for Feedback Darkness: When agents make purchasing decisions, brands lose direct consumer insights. You’ll know what sells but not why. Build new ways to understand your customers before that connection disappears.
Speed Beats Strategy: Quarterly planning is the new annual. The technology moves too fast for long-term roadmaps. Focus on rapid experimentation over perfect planning.
Respect the Paradox: Gen Z wanting both automation and authenticity isn’t confusion—it’s strategy. They’re outsourcing the exhausting to reclaim energy for the energizing.
The Real Trade-Off
Gen Z wants AI to do the dull things in life so they can get back to actually living. They’re not building an automated future; they’re automating their way back to a human one.
The infrastructure is months old. Standards barely exist. But Gen Z is already mentally sorting life into “delegate this” and “keep this human.”
The question isn’t if this shift is coming—it’s whether brands understand what Gen Z actually wants: Not more choices, but fewer decisions that don’t matter.
3 Links
Curiosity is contagious; if you like this newsletter, please share it!!
Penned by Libby Rodney and Abbey Lunney, founders of the Thought Leadership + Futures Group at The Harris Poll.
 | A guest post by
|